|
Post by thelegacy on Aug 10, 2017 15:21:58 GMT
Yes Carl I meant to say Altacast. Don't know why the speech to text came up with Altivista. As far as the bugs in Altacast I do remember a few of those myself. I've come to realize that if you want a quality bug FREE encoder that streams both AAC+ and Mp3 while running multiple streams a paid Encoder is the best way to go.
But I realize they don't make Samcast or at least 3.83 anymore. Radiocaster may be something worth paying for and I'll tell you why from my experience with it. Though NextKast has a built in encoder I chose to use Radiocaster as an external encoder because if you have silence for more than a few seconds NextKast will actually have a break in the stream causing the listeners to have to reconnect.
Radiocaster allows even silence to stream while the clock keeps running. This is good if you want to fade to black and then announce like I do with Album Rock. I never talk over the music as this is not what an Album Rock station does. We wait to complete fade to black before talking. Plus when going from song to song we almost fade to black. This gives the sense of listening to an album with various artists. The music should run smoothly.
Radiocaster does have a nice meter as well but I do like Bob's VU meter he sent me as an exe file. It allows for an accurate way to keep your levels from going into the red if your a poor man like me and the computer is the actual mixer. It helps really have a nice clean stream and this is important if you plan to run your stream to your transmitter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2017 15:24:53 GMT
About B.U.T.T.As Bob Felmly MRAM 1500 has explained, this is Stream Encoding software whose full name is Broadcast Using This Tool. And for 1-hour KDX has been streaming from B.U.T.T. with stability. No bugs have been found. Where To Find B.U.T.T.To TheLegacy... Thanks for the additional information and I will check everything out during my summer of stream studies!
|
|
|
Post by part15engineer on Aug 10, 2017 16:30:43 GMT
i shut my stream off. can't afford the licensing fees or the licensing structure used in the USA. if they just charged a small yearly / monthly flat fee for non commercial with no tlh limits or reporting requirements then i could afford it, but the structure and cost is prohibitive for my financial situation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2017 16:47:11 GMT
Is There Any Hope?
Part 15 Engineer turned his stream off because he can't afford the licensing fees or the licensing structure used in the USA.
And that's been a major problem for small sized streaming radio since the royalty commission dropped protections for small operations.
For awhile there were actions and movements attempting to get the matter re-heard and better rules, but lately nothing has been heard.
We wonder, is it hopeless or is some special interest group still trying to get things fixed?
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Aug 13, 2017 6:35:12 GMT
There is hope on the Battlefront. I am a part of a large organization not created by myself who has been fighting for Internet radio rights for hobby broadcasters. Tomorrow I have to go to a meeting by phone by the way and there will be a total of 1000 folks on a conference. The conference company is the same one I tried to use for the new radio Revolution.
I will give you some hints though think Stardome Digital Media. Also think about the fact that licensed radio stations also have an umbrella to broadcast on the internet. Now think what would happen if a media company that owns commercial radio stations where to actually meet with hobby broadcasters and come up with a reasonable compromise. Think this is all part of a fantasy I may have in my head? Will find out tomorrow after 3 p.m. in the afternoon EDT. This will go down in Radio history and my friends as I've told you before it pays to be a soldier of change.
I've told you once twice 100 times that I have been a part of many different organizations behind the scenes. So with that in mind I might know some things that I cannot actually disclose until it's about to happen. But I will tell you this there's a certain AM radio station about to be bought by a media company who is all for the hobby broadcasters. What a leap of fate that is to some of the folks that have been trying to kill any possibility for the hobby broadcaster to exist.
Some of you on this forum know exactly what I'm talking about when I talk about this meeting that's about to happen tomorrow. The people who know can't say anything but I guarantee you it's going to be a surprise move.
My sponsor and I have been in contact with each other and he's about ready to Unleash the Beast. Let's put it this way one of the big Pros may end up owing hobby broadcasters hundreds of dollars in overpayments.
I think it's kind of funny because never has this ever taken place where hobby broadcasters on the internet has ever won against these bully boys. But it takes a few people who have guts to stand firm and stand strong and indemnify hobby broadcasters who have been bullied for too long by these sharks. A song by Elvis Costello now comes to my mind radio radio, radio radio.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2017 20:27:35 GMT
I'm confused. I'm not sure if Thelegacy is railing against the songwriters, the licensing organizations or licensed radio stations. Maybe all three!
While I don't like the current copyright laws and licensing fees, I'm not sure what can be done about it. That's not giving up or being complacent. It's just facing facts.
We haven't written or performed the songs that are copyrighted. We don't own any creative rights to them. The songwriters and performers do. And they have the right to attach any value they want to them. We as radio stations or streamers (big or little) can choose to pay the freight, or not.
The way I see it, if I write, as an example, some sofware, I can choose various pricing strategies for those who want to use it. I can go with the high price/small user base approach, or I can price it so that I get a small amount of money from a lot of users. Either way, it's my choice, and I either sink or swim with it. Microsoft is a good example of a company that adopted the latter approach; IBM the former. Obviously both strategies can work. However, it's not up to the users to dictate the price I'm to charge for MY software. If they don't like it, then they don't have to buy it. End of story.
So, people can rail against copyright licensing fees all they want. If they're so onerous that the primary users, i.e., licensed stations, balk at paying, and attempt to find cheaper alternatives, then they'll drop. But as long as the big boys are willing to pay, I don't think that the licensing bodies care enough about the little guy to change anything.
We as little guys then have to find alternative programming that doesn't cost an arm or a leg (or anything, for that matter). But isn't that one of the reasons why we supposedly exist? I keep hearing it, but then I also continuously hear people complaining about paying licensing fees for the music that everyone else is playing.
Do something different! Originate a lot of your own programming. Get permission to play music from indy bands that aren't signed up with the licensing organizations. Find material that is in the public domain (and even in the U.S. there is no shortage of it). In other words, let's walk our talk. Be unique. And if your programming is outside of your own comfort zone, you might even learn a thing or two. I know I have (although there's still a long way to go).
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Aug 16, 2017 7:36:15 GMT
Let me see if I can make things a little bit clearer since a lot of people think that all I am about is going after everybody who wants you to pay for something.
My sponsor has paid dearly for my station to be on the internet. We're talking more than $80 per month pretty close to $100 some months because it goes by The Listener tuning hours. So to put that in perspective it would be the same thing as if you were to buy a Rangemaster AM transmitter every month and then give it away.
Now then my sponsor is part of a major radio organization actually more than one. We're talking companies like stardome digital media also we're talking companies such as Pro streaming dot net and he recently bought out yet another company dealing in Internet Radio.
Now him and his partners are looking at buying WKTF AM which the deal is pretty much gone through already. What this is supposed to allow is a blanket licensing deal because radio stations get a license blanket deal where they can broadcast and internet webcast at the same time.
This is where things start to become kind of ugly. Because ASCAP somehow found out and was still saying that even though they have done this that it would not cover our licensing. But the reason that Pandora didn't get their deal to go through with the FCC was because they were a foreign company in other words the owner was not part of the United States.
Back to the topic ASCAP is still threatening to sue individuals for copyright infringement. Now then my sponsor now has a major attorney going after ASCAP because they are being unfair they have been told that there was an issue with the auditing software to begin with and they have a third party company which is reading everything so that we are not charged for playing commercials which do not have any music in them.
ASCAP has been very uncooperative and with their staunch bullying techniques has forced a lot of people to drop their stations. But since I belong to my sponsors Network which again told you is some pretty big Networks I am actually able to continue doing what I do. But at the same time ASCAP is continually harassing him and anyone on his Network.
The good news is that when this is all over there will be cheaper rates and more fairness towards hobby internet broadcasters. This means you don't have to stick to Indy broadcasting only.
My sponsor loves album Rock and this is how I ended up getting him as a sponsor because I have been playing stuff that you don't hear anywhere else and when he heard my station many years ago he wanted to sponsor me. So it pays to play a format that is eclectic and unique compared to the everyday dribble that you here on Commercial radio.
I suggested to him that we may have to buy a major album rock station say in the state where I live. Then what we would do is we would simply hook my internet signal to that major station and become a legal album Rock broadcaster on that great big huge radio station.
This is why I laugh because if it ever did happen think of it a hobby broadcaster becomes not only an internet broadcaster but an over-the-air broadcast and plays stuff that you don't normally hear anywhere else.
And again this is why I say it does pay to be a soldier of change because if people don't fight for change nothing good will ever come.
It just boils down to certain big folks want to become too greedy and keep the little guy quiet. But this time it's not going to continue to happen.
|
|
|
Post by jimhenry2000 on Sept 5, 2017 2:09:24 GMT
Will this seminar be available via recording once it happens?
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Sept 5, 2017 15:44:34 GMT
I've got a few Family events happening in a few days. I just recovered from a Hard Drive crash on my main Laptop I used for my Radio Station. Thank God I was able to copy the music to my Wife's computer and then by using Team Viewer I was able to copy it back onto an older Laptop that I had where as before it stopped working but now works just fine. Don't know what made it stop but I'm glad this one is working again.
My New laptop is in the shop and I think when I get it back I can use it for a separate broadcast to my Transmitter when I'm not doing a Live show since I have to play commercials and use "Trigger files" every 4th song to afford to pay the ridiculous royalty fee's to broadcast legally on the Internet so I can be on the Radio Directories.
I'm thinking however of making an audio presentation in 128K Mp3 about Radio Streaming with NextKast and ad supported content to help you stay a float legally.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 21:14:27 GMT
Seminar Will Be Posted By ALPB
Jim Henry asks: "Will this seminar be available via recording once it happens?"
YES.
The ALPB Main Website will post the Seminar on Radio Streaming.
I'm guessing it will be in several parts, since a number of members will be describing their own particular methods of streaming.
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Sept 11, 2017 20:58:57 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2017 21:48:22 GMT
Looking Forward to Listening
I will get that downloaded if possible.
I had a subscription to Dropbox but for reasons I can't remember I dumped it. I think at the time I heard that Dropbox sold or gave away profile information of their users... a violation of privacy.
Oh, oh, I just thought of a plan!
At the meeting Saturday maybe Chairman Bob can grab your lecture and get it to me, then I can link it through the ALPB website.
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Sept 12, 2017 3:33:34 GMT
If you're worried about Dropbox giving out your personal information you can always sign up with bogus information and definitely use a VPN and then download the file that way or listen.
Looks like the next lecture I will have to do will be one on VPN's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2017 0:09:20 GMT
Streaming University
As reported in the ALPB News Column, KDX is now experimenting with very low-bit-rate streaming for the growing number of dial-up and slow internet customers caused by the industries refusal to provide high quality service to rural areas and the excessive high prices which cause many people to cancel.
These experiments are valuable for learning more about stream coding and implementation.
About 45-minutes was spent watching YouTube "how to" videos and I must say the quality of what I saw is not so good.
One of the presenters gave valuable information but rushed through it only to leave a trail of confusion.
Another presenter recorded at ultra-low level so was hard to hear plus had a mush-mouthed speech which was not easy to understand.
Very few people are as perfect as we are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2017 20:13:12 GMT
Status of KDX Low Bitrate Stream
In a different thread we announced the launch of a new KDX Very Low Bandwidth Stream to serve the large and growing number of subscribers in the world lacking access to high speed internet. These include slow computers, poor local service, and dial-up-users avoiding high cost.
It's been more than a week streaming at 8 kbps, 11,025 kHz, and there is yet no sign of listeners, however this is attributed to word not having gotten around about this tremendous new resource.
No one I know has a clue how KDX can communicate with our potentially massive audience, so we'll start with a post-it note at the local public library.
We began with an even lower speed... 8 kbps, 8 kHz... which only gave us an audio bandwidth of about 4 kHz which is somewhat grating on the ear. By increasing the sample rate to 11.025 kHz we manage to increase the width to 5 kHz, a better voice range.
There've been hints of a Futurist of the Year Award for KDX, but we'll need to replace light magenta before it can be printed.
|
|