|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 13:09:25 GMT
I have very little information right at the moment but I thought of the group when I read this on Facebook earlier. The FCC wants 700 WLW to reduce their power, currently 50,000 watts, there is a petition to sign too if anyone is interested. Petition Link
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 13:15:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2016 15:10:36 GMT
Didn't See This Coming
Wow, who would have thunk the FCC would start hacking away at established successful AM stations while also giving lip service to "re-vitalizing" the AM dial?
Could it be that WLW has fallen into disfavor with the NAB or otherwise practiced the "wrong politics"?
The "powers that be" can get very treacherous at times.
Thank you Mr. Bucket for this startling news.
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 15:24:54 GMT
Hmm I wonder if this has anything to do with the request for power reduction? Scroll down to where it say's : Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making "The FCC is seeking comments on the following proposals: Change Nighttime and Critical Hours Protection to Class A Stations – The FCC is proposing: (1) to protect all Class A stations from co-channel stations, both day and night, to their 0.1 mV/m groundwave contours; (2) to protect all Class A stations from first adjacent channel stations, both day and night, to their 0.5 mV/m contours; and (3) to eliminate the critical hours protection for Class A stations. With this proposal, the Commission tentatively concluded that it should favor improved service by local stations over service by Class A stations over a wide geographic area. The FNPRM asks what populations will lose service under this proposal and whether they “currently avail themselves of the services that would be lost” (i.e., do they listen to the distant station), whether there are areas that only receive service from Class A stations, and the number of stations that would be able to increase power and what populations would gain service under the proposal. The Commission also seeks comment from those stations that would benefit from this proposal on the effect on rural areas and EAS Primary Entry Point stations." HERE IS A LINK TO THE ARTICLE Published October 29 2015
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 16:22:03 GMT
So i sent a shout out to Leland Conway and staff at 84 WHAS radio in Louisville,Ky and asked had they heard about WLW-AM being asked to reduce power and had they been asked to do this as well? The answer to both questions was YES... Here is the email response to my shoutout.
Hi, Barry.
Yes, we are aware of a proposal being discussed to force Class 1A clear channel stations, such as WHAS and WLW, to reduce their broadcast coverage areas.
We certainly hope that does not happen, as many listeners in distant and rural areas depend on these big radio stations for news, entertainment, and emergency information, such as weather warnings.
Interestingly, Kentucky has one of the lowest rates of broadband Internet availability among all states in the U.S. So, streaming is not an option for many people. They depend on over-the-air radio.
Thanks for writing, and for listening to NewsRadio 840 WHAS.
Kelly Carls
Director of AM Programming
National News/Talk Brand Coordinator
iHeartMedia
o 502.479.2091
Reaching a quarter billion consumers every month
Radio/Digital/Outdoor/Mobile/Social/Events
From: 84 WHAS [mailto:whas@whas.com] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:43 AM To: Carls, Kelly Subject: Barry sent you a Shoutout from WHAS-AM!
You have received a Shoutout from Barry (barry.sallade@gmail.com) The message is: Hi Leland and the staff at WHAS. Have you read the story about the FCC asking WLW-AM to reduce their power? I was wondering if the FCC asked your station this as well since you're considered a clear channel station (note:not the company Clear Channel) the designation of 50,000 watt stations is considered clear channel or Class A. What are your thoughts, there is a petition to the fcc to not reduce wlw's power. Thanks Barry in E. Ky
This email was sent by: Clear Channel Louisville, KY 4000 Radio Dr Ste. 1 Louisville, KY, 40218, US
Since this seems to work well for communicating with WHAS Radio i am going to ask for details, be back in a bit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2016 16:29:36 GMT
DXers Be Damned
I think you have zeroed in on the heart of the matter, Barry. It appears that the FCC is attempting yet another unnecessary and useless change to a system that isn't broken.
Instead of "re-vitalizing" AM it seems like the FCC is trying to cripple it, much as they have the FM band with all the translators.
DXing would never be the same.
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 16:46:02 GMT
Ok so i asked another question, hoping for an answer
Thank You Kelly,
Can you give me details? What is the reasoning behind forcing Class 1A stations to reduce power? You mentioned broadband, here in Perry County (Hazard,Ky) and surrounding counties in Eastern Ky there has been a promise from government officials to bring broadband internet service to the area via Fiber Optics as a way to help revitalize the dying economy in the region.
My take on it has nothing to do with broadband but rather the FCC plans for "revitalizing the AM band" although i feel the recent fix offered now is not viable in all areas of the United States, putting AM on 250 watt FM translators won't really work in metropolitan areas where the FM band is already congested.
I feel it might end with AM going to the wayside while the FCC pushes everyone to FM to eventually switching to an all digital format in the same way that Europe has done with AM and Shortwave radio stations. All of this has come to light recently but the one thing not addressed by the FCC is how they will clean up the noise caused by dirty electronic devices that cause interference to the AM Band.
Thanks Barry Sallade
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 26, 2016 17:05:04 GMT
Ask and Ye Shall Receive, but you'll have to be under their antenna. Hello again, Barry. You can read about the FCC’s proposal here: apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-142A1.pdf The section you’re interested in starts on Page 23. I hope the information is useful. Kelly Carls Director of AM Programming National News/Talk Brand Coordinator EDIT: I was having trouble with the fcc edocs link so i uploaded my copy to google drive... LINK TO DOC
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Feb 27, 2016 2:05:35 GMT
Here is a list of all the clear channel AM stations in America and a few abroad as well. Most of the American 50,000 watt AM's will be required to make changes to their signals according to this Document. LIST OF CLASS 1A 50,000 watt AM
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2016 2:58:22 GMT
Scrambled FCC Eggs
One fact stands at the start of all the concern about the future of AM radio in the Homeland (formerly the U.S.) and that is that the popularity of AM has declined, is continuing to decline, and the future is bleak. Yes, I mentioned several things, but the one fact is the bleak future.
So now we have toy FM translators coming into use, possible downgrading of full channel 50 kW stations, and talk of adding more stations up on the X-band.
After all that the AM band will have declined more, lost more stations, and probably will become past history.
Part 15 stations will be there to jump on the open space until we all go extinct.
|
|
|
Post by bluebucketradio on Mar 18, 2016 15:09:56 GMT
I wanted to follow up on this development, here is a link to comments filed to the fcc concerning Revitalization of the AM Radio Service . It's a mixed bag of Nays and Yays, I will just leave the link here as i have more comments to read at the FCC website. After some careful thought and more reading I hope to come back with some of my own comments and concerns to share with the collective. LINK TO COMMENTS
|
|