Post by End80 on Feb 25, 2019 10:11:38 GMT
But the way a Licensed Radio Service is constructed a private individual cannot possibly "Legally" get a license. ...The Licenses should be as easy as GMRS to get. A set a reasonable rules and that is it. I see hobby operators acting more reasonable than some Licensed stations running Day power at night...
AM is 400% more expensive as apposed to FM the old idea that everyone and their brother or sister would suddenly erect a station is just not going to happen. ... Nothing in part 15 rules for AM says you can't have a High Gain antenna. Think beams, and ways to reflect your signal where you want to make it go. Counterpoise is something that greatly improves Range too.
New Radio Revolution wanted to change the rules and make a level playing field at least on the Dying medium wave band....
Just something for all the nay Sayers to think about.
Breaking down your points to address them..
• Well, your opening statement is basically exactly what just I said in my last post, that would be more reasonable than what your "revolution" is suggesting. And you're correct licensed TIS operators must be either a government agency or at least the holder of the license must be (there are numerous operators of TIS stations which are not part of a government agency).
• As far as the license being as simple as a GMRS license.. come on, your talking unreasonable again, there's a major difference between broadcast GMRS and public AM broadcasting. When you say it "should be" you just mean you "want it to be".. You ever hear the expression "You only want what you can't get?".. it usually refers to a guy wanting particular grade of woman, but you get the point.
• Yes, I've heard a few stories about licensed stations commonly breaking the rules by applying non permitted power levels, and you're right, that conduct is basically comparable to pirating, and should be more strongly enforced against. It's hypocrisy.
• AM may be 400% more expensive than FM (I don't know), but that's certainly not the case when it comes to something similar to a TIS operation; Again, if a separate class of licensing could be approved similar to TIS, but without the content restrictions, then the cost involved would be quite minimal by licensed station standards.
• I'm not certain about the legality of high gain antennas with part 15 AM, I'm not even sure what that means, but there are restrictions to what kind of additional components may be employed in a part 15 AM system, if a "high gain antenna" would violate in anyway I'm really not sure because as I said really don't know what you mean. As for a counterpoise.. well that's exactly what a long ground lead creates.
• As for what you mentioned about Rangemaster and other manufactures claims of extended range, yes, they say that but they also provide disclaimers concerning it, you can't focus on only what's a capability is but ignore the disclaimers they also provide concerning it.
• As for your "Radio Revolution" wanting to change the rules and making a level playing field in the dying AM band.. Again, the point I keep trying to make to you.. Your not going to ever be able to because it's an unreasonable objective to change a rule which primary purpose is to insure restricted range to protect licensed services of those same bands.
• And lastly, for reasons I already recently expressed to you in other post, the AM band is not dying, it's becoming less popular due to increased interferences, but it's not going anywhere, it's not going just become a wasteland as you may hope. Homeland security has too much interest in it.
By the way.. I just realized, we have compliantly disrupted this threads topic - This should have been taken to a new thread.. in fact, I'll carry my response to a new one right now.. Ok, now it's in it's own thread.