|
Post by Druid Hills Radio on Mar 23, 2018 19:59:48 GMT
Dave Sharpe March 2, 2018 at 1:57 pm
So I am curious. How many of these 10 day notices actually get a response? So far I have only read of one from Florida that must have got spooked. I am friends with a fellow that works for the FCC that is a pirate himself which I find hilarious. He said give it 6 months and it will be forgotten. Go back on and it’s business as usual. I think that the FCC has their hands full of problems as it is to have time and money to chase pirates to say anything about ensuring Pai’s threats against American’s claiming back their airwaves are maintained. I love the word-play in those enforcement letters.
“You have ten (10) days from the date of this notice to respond with any evidence that you have
authority to operate granted by the Commission.”
Why should anyone explain to them something we have partial ownership of? It’s the same thing as explaining why I live in the house I own
|
|
|
Post by Boomer on Mar 23, 2018 23:15:55 GMT
Pirates, a more extreme version of Part-15 ideology?
People are disillusioned with the state of affairs on the radio, with national networks that really don't talk to them or play music that they might like. Unless you're the lightest listener who likes to have noise come out of the radio instead of silence, or haven't given up on radio completely, it's easy to think something is wrong with radio. Now with the state of technology, and knowledge about it, it's not that hard to do something about it.
The same statement could be made for someone who wants to do Part-15 radio, but maybe doesn't want the responsibility of a bigger signal, the risk, or to take the time to do a higher profile station. I read sites and articles about radio all the time, and there are people who are saddened by programming on the radio to downright ticked off at national networks, and they remember how good radio was when they were growing up.
I wouldn't be surprised with anyone running a pirate station, anyone who is involved in radio, exposed to the technology all the time could do it. I've heard stories of broadcast engineers who ran pirate stations, also CBers, hams, DJs.
Boomer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 0:19:44 GMT
Moonlighters
Not so unusual what DHR read: "I am friends with a fellow that works for the FCC that is a pirate himself."
Are there not doctors who do side jobs for wealthy clients? Firefighters with arson ambitions? Cops with stolen property? Politicians with money kickbacks under the table? Journalism departments that report news favorable to their corporate owners? Preachers who save souls by saving tax free money? Street workers who do private driveways on the side using city resources? Building inspectors whose brother does plumbing and carpentry to help violators "meet code"? Restaurants with AAA ratings and rats because the inspector was paid off? Women who keep secrets for the right price unless a TV network outbids and she goes public? Former Vice President who warns about starving polar bears and global warming from his 30-million dollar energy sucking beach mansion? Part 15 hobbyists who cry poor while they live million dollar life styles?
What will those human animals do next?
|
|
|
Post by mark on Mar 24, 2018 4:42:04 GMT
Also cops giving you a ticket when they do the same thing and are invincible. But part 15 hobbyists living like millionares and claiming poor?
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Mar 24, 2018 5:20:54 GMT
All of this is not surprising me that the public is finally starting to come out and cry for something to be changed.
In the small town where I was living and broadcasting if my transmitter wasn't so dirty and emitting harmonics and Spurs I do believe that many folks would have enjoyed my album Rock programming for quite some time.
That being said and moving forward if Hobby AM broadcasters are allowed to have a full quieting signal for 1.5 to 2 miles I do believe that some of this could be solved in small towns and at the same time not cause any issues with the major markets or the radio spectrum.
The model needs fixing and quick. Will the public help rewrite this? I think maybe so. Maybe boycotting Radio is the legal means to use our voices.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Mar 24, 2018 5:41:49 GMT
I've been "boycotting" radio for a long time now and just listening to mine except for CHML 900AM from Hamilton Ontario as they have old radio dramas from the 1930s 40s etc. from 10PM to 1AM every day. Even with the original ads too. But not listening to radio....is this an effective action? The stations don't know if you are listening or not unless a huge segment of the population does it and it's reflected in the ratings when they do the surveys.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Mar 24, 2018 5:58:28 GMT
Pirates, a more extreme version of Part-15 ideology?People are disillusioned with the state of affairs on the radio, with national networks that really don't talk to them or play music that they might like. Unless you're the lightest listener who likes to have noise come out of the radio instead of silence, or haven't given up on radio completely, it's easy to think something is wrong with radio. Now with the state of technology, and knowledge about it, it's not that hard to do something about it. The same statement could be made for someone who wants to do Part-15 radio, but maybe doesn't want the responsibility of a bigger signal, the risk, or to take the time to do a higher profile station. I read sites and articles about radio all the time, and there are people who are saddened by programming on the radio to downright ticked off at national networks, and they remember how good radio was when they were growing up. I wouldn't be surprised with anyone running a pirate station, anyone who is involved in radio, exposed to the technology all the time could do it. I've heard stories of broadcast engineers who ran pirate stations, also CBers, hams, DJs. Boomer Most of the people that have given up on radio and think it sucks are older people like "us" who remember how it used to be. Radio doesn't care about us and just cares about young people that the advertisers want to get to.
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Mar 24, 2018 6:59:10 GMT
Which I think is ironic and funny. Older people like us actually pay the bills because we're more financially stable and our life is more stable.
It's hard to believe that teens and tweens care about mortgage or life insurance or anything about tenants resources and other things dealing with apartment living. Their main concern is the latest fashion designs and trying to keep up with their friends. They might actually care about no contract prepaid cell phones which ones have the most data for the money. Which one's actually have better coverage. But advertising cell phones only isn't really going to do much for your radio station financially.
I've said it before that a discrimination lawsuit needs to be made but at the same time one has to be careful how they would do it. It's illegal to discriminate by age sex or religion but yet isn't that exactly what the big corporate wigs of radio are doing? By not having at least one receivable album rock station in most cities especially where older people live to me is a clear violation of the law. Plus I do believe not having a real country station and I'm not talking about pop tree or wrap tree but real country for the folks who remember the old country artists like Porter Wagoner Charlie Pride and Johnny Cash along with Loretta Lynn and others. These want to be country artist are a conglomeration of wannabe classic rock and for God sake where does rap have anything to do with country? But yet I hear it so doesn't that make it more of a pop rock type format or something similar?
African Americans were able to sue MTV back in the 80s for not playing Earth Wind & Fire. They claim that it was a discriminatory thing against the race. SO2 could the elderly have a nice lawsuit against many of the big radio Giants and probably win the lawsuit if they could prove discrimination against them which in my opinion should not be that hard to do. If they want to go after hobby broadcasters this is something I do think that needs to be done. This way the radio Giants will be held back from monopolizing the airwaves and doing as they damn well please versus what the people really want because I remember in my radio classes part of being a licensee is to provide the public interest convenience and necessity. Nowhere in that claws does it say young people only unless I stand corrected somehow.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 11:11:53 GMT
Boycotts and Girlcotts
TheLegacy suggests: "Maybe boycotting Radio is the legal means to use our voices."
Mark is right. We already boycott radio by having our own stations. We have no time to listen to any other station than our own.
May I suggest boycotting their advertisers?
If you contact the advertisers that place commercials on the large stations and let them know you are not shopping at their store or buying their product because you dislike the programming they sponsor... there will be a huge uprising and things will change.
But if the large stations started playing album rock then you wouldn't be necessary.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Mar 24, 2018 15:34:22 GMT
Carl...I nominate you for Chairman!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 15:52:21 GMT
Polite Turn-down
Thanks Mark but I already have enough chairs.
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on Mar 24, 2018 16:14:13 GMT
Lol Carl I never thought of boycotting the advertisers of Big Radio! Seems logical if an organization was to somehow convince other disgruntle adults to do this I'll bet things could change. What about the society on aging, The Moose Club, other organizations that folks our age may belong to? Maybe this could get the big boys to play nice with the micro broadcasters.
But Carl has another point and that is if other stations started playing Album Rock then The Legacy may not be needed on air. It is a point and a good one.
|
|