Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2018 21:55:45 GMT
There's Something Bad About My Good 1550 Transmitter
It's an AMT3000 rigged for External Antenna with loading-coil and what's bad is that it doesn't throw signal very much beyond the building.
What's good is that within and just adjacent to the building it comes through like a 50 kW flame-thrower.
The center of trouble is the antenna which is a concoction called the "Wintenna".
Intending to keep the transmitter indoors I use a metal window frame as part of a 6-foot vertical antenna that is finished off at the bottom and top by wire to approximate a 10' vertical, all phased to an external wall.
The ground lead drops through the baseboard and clamps to the steel I-beam in the basement.
But the I-beam isn't actually underground, it is up above the basement floor and only eventually connects to true ground by the electric service ground rod and cold water pipe.
I think what's happening is that the negative side is resonating and not so much the window frame.
Result is that the wonderful programs I try to hear out in the yard while working as landscape executive are diminished within the static and during critical hours, near sunset, I hear other cities.
The motivation to improve the situation is postponed as days go by and I wonder what to try next.
Thanks for listening. Without friends like you I wouldn't have friends like you.
|
|
|
Post by mark on May 3, 2018 23:36:33 GMT
"Intending to keep the transmitter indoors I use a metal window frame as part of a 6-foot vertical antenna that is finished off at the bottom and top by wire to approximate a 10' vertical, all phased to an external wall."
This could be some of the problem as the window frame could be upsetting the way the antenna works for the worse not the better. But you have exactly what you want your range to be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2018 0:23:25 GMT
Not Exactly
Mark says: "But you have exactly what you want your range to be."
The signal from the 1550 AM transmitter is perfect indoors, but outside it fades fast and doesn't deliver a very good signal to the portable Grundig when I'm doing things out there.
The outdoor coverage needs to be improved... that's the objective and I will be fiddling with it.
|
|
|
Post by Boomer on May 4, 2018 0:47:02 GMT
From my frequency experience
From my experiences it's not unusual to have that kind of field strength nearby and then have it drop off quickly.
I had that effect on my Radio Shack AM Broadcaster kit that got me started, and I hooked a phonograph to it. Nearby it sounded like I had a megawatt, louder and wider than any other station. I thought somehow I'd created a high power signal by a wiring mistake, and I was worried about the kind of power it was putting out, that I'd jam neighboring radios and the police would come.
I found that the signal was already weak just outside of the house, and might have been gone in 60 feet, if that far. It's about the near field and concentration of signal indoors, caused by surrounding metal I think, and it happens with indoor transmitters like the Talking House too.
One thing you could try Carl is to connect a long radial to the ground side of the transmitter and lay it on the earth all the way to the other side of your yard, to give a kind of controlled signal. I've had strong signals along a radial before, not trying for that effect, but it happened.
I'd try it both with the I-beam connected also, and by itself as a ground and see which has the signal you want.
Boomer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2018 1:19:59 GMT
Good Advice
Boomer suggests: "One thing you could try Carl is to connect a long radial to the ground side of the transmitter and lay it on the earth all the way to the other side of your yard."
I agree 100% because my OTHER Wintenna transmitter has a setup exactly like that and is amazing.
Yes, the AMT5000 is grounded to a radial that points south for 100' buried in the earth behind the building and the signal travels for blocks at 1680 kHz.
There is a northern radial in that same system, but it enters the basement and runs parallel to the I-beam and does less transmission toward the north.
Different ways of grounding are not equal to each other... some work better.
|
|
|
Post by Boomer on May 4, 2018 2:32:58 GMT
Yes, I may have read that you had done some radial experimenting before, and it made a directional system.
The radial doesn't really put out much far-field signal because it's on the ground, but nearby to it the signal could be strong, and it might help the Wintenna radiate a little better.
There's an parallel in the way that drive-in movie theaters have been set up for AM carrier current, where the transmitter's hot side feeds the underground wiring that goes to the speaker poles. That way there's a strong signal near every car.
In the diagram I saw, I think the ground on the transmitter went to a ground rod near the projection building, but I wonder if an opposite branch of the speaker wiring could be used for the ground, kind of like a dipole underground.
Good to be doing this project, you have to give your kestrels and jackdaws something to listen to back there!
Boomer
|
|
|
Post by mark on May 4, 2018 5:00:56 GMT
I still think, but I am no expert in AM transmitting, that your "wintenna" is not the way the antenna was designed to be set up and it is adversly affecting your tuning to peak with the output of the transmitter. Try the wire extended straight outside the window if possible and not touching anything metal. Seems that with your set up you aren't doing any better than FM at the legal part 15 limit would do, even less.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2018 9:54:18 GMT
Mark Hits the Mark
A true statement: "I still think that your "wintenna" is not the way the antenna was designed to be set up and it is adversly affecting your tuning to peak with the output of the transmitter."
I know you are right about this, Mark.
Several years back when I first tried this "Wintenna" design, the inventor of the AMT3000/5000 transmitters informed us that because the metal window frame is mounted as part of the building wall, it has an extremely different capacitance than a vertical antenna located in open space, and it is that added capacitance that makes it less able to tune correctly.
We found that it is possible to achieve a match by adding a capacitor in line with the transmission line, in the case of the AMT5000 a 23pF cap, but there is no way to achieve the much greater range possible from a clear and open location.
|
|
|
Post by thelegacy on May 5, 2018 0:39:55 GMT
I spoke to another person from the group am and FM hobby broadcasting on Facebook but unfortunately because of a few from another individual I'm not on there right now at the moment. But I do have this person's name on messenger and we talked for a bit and he did tell me that a procaster on a 20-foot High installation will hit around 2.5 miles. This person has been transmitting for quite some time with his and his had very good luck with it. I would suggest to use a standard vertical antenna and get yours up on top of your roof up in the clear and see what you get. This way you don't have things that are blocking you and it should be the correct capacitance. In your case you may have to build the antenna for the AMT 5000 and try it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2018 0:03:37 GMT
Experiences Planned and Unplanned
TheLegacy, I agree with you that some interesting things can be done with AM antennas up on rooftops or mounted high on a pole, but my particular plans are confined... in this thread at least... to optimizing the Wintenna, because it is the only known compromise for building an antenna that is both inward and outward facing at the same time, with the added advantage of keeping the transmitter safely indoors.\
The clumsy part of the Wintenna is caused because it is on an outside wall, with physical earth out beyond the building suitable for laying radials, but open basement underneath the floor on the inward side which, even though there are "ground-points:" such as I-beams, pipes, electrical service ground, it is not physically "under"ground and thus it becomes a maze of warped and distorted unintended dipoles adding peculiar phase angles and impedances. The solution would be to fill the basement with truckloads of dirt.
Therefore I plan to study the wild field of "artificial grounds", of the type HAMs devise for transmitter setups located indoors on upper stories of buildings with no access to earth ground.
Keep the ideas coming. We are only beginning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2018 1:24:53 GMT
If you have a ProCaster (or any other AM transmitter for that matter) 20 feet up, presumably you're grounded, which means a ground wire of at least 20 feet (or more, depending on what you're grounding to). That's the reason you're getting 2.5 miles range.
A ground mounted Part 15 legal transmitter is going to get 1 or slightly more mile range (depending on ground conductivity). Calculations done over at Part15.us indicate that that is about right for a legal system (maybe more in RF quiet areas). I managed to achieve a bit over a mile on a sensitive car radio in most directions with a ground mounted Rangemaster and external audio processing in an area with excellent ground conductivity, and slightly more in one direction.
I do wish that these excessive ranges weren't bandied about so much. There are so many factors to range. 2.5 miles is definitely not typical. And for everyone who may get above a mile, there are those who are quite disappointed and get significantly less.
|
|
|
Post by Boomer on May 8, 2018 11:23:04 GMT
I'd test with a radial out to where you want your signal, connected to the transmitter's ground. I've done it with speaker wire on a spool to make temporary radials, and rolled it up when done, and if it's not outside for too many days, there's no damage to the wire.
Thinking about how this works, I wonder about a power line enhancement I've had on my Talking House.. There are some setups I've done where there's been a strong carrier current effect, where the over-the-air signal will seem to go a few hundred feet away from my house, but I can walk to a power pole a quarter mile away and get a good signal with a portable radio held up to the pole.
That's with the transmitter and antenna fully indoors, and in the basement, and my idea had been that the antenna was radiating a signal into the power lines that was taking the form of a carrier current, but now I wonder if it wasn't the ground side of the transmitter causing it. Sometimes I've connected a ground wire from the TH's chassis to the ground screw on the AC socket.
Right Artisan, it would be better not to over-sell the capabilities of transmitters when it comes to range. It seems like people with an interest in selling them will do that, and I think in the community of users it amounts to boasting about one's coverage.
Then there are new people who fall into Part-15 radio and want to know the territory they can expect to cover, before they invest in a system.
Boomer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2018 12:16:57 GMT
Verification Absolute
Boomer submits: "I'd test with a radial out to where you want your signal, connected to the transmitter's ground."
This has been found to be true without doubt, Boomer is 100% on target.
When first installed, my AMT5000 would not put a decent usable signal uphill the 100' to the top of the property.
After adding a buried copper radial wire from transmitter ground up to the top of the yard the signal is full-scale all the way up, and it can be received on a car radio for several blocks more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2018 17:44:47 GMT
Boomer said "Then there are new people who fall into Part-15 radio and want to know the territory they can expect to cover, before they invest in a system."
I'd say that that is the most common question to those looking at Part 15 broadcasting systems. How much range will I get?
The correct answer, of course, is ... it depends. It depends on a number of factors that you can't control, such as ground conductivity, RF noise, surrounding geography and construction, etc. It also depends on factors that you can control, such as transmitter field strength, antenna location, audio processing, receiver sensitivity, etc.
But to say or to even imply that you'll routinely get 2.5 miles range with a legal Part 15 AM transmitter is doing that inquiring individual a disservice.
Maybe, just maybe, with a great radio, a near perfect installation and location, excellent ground conductivity, radials, the perfect geography and in just the right direction, you might pick a signal up at the 2.5 mile range. Maybe. Certainly not typically.
My experience has been that range will vary wildly with those factors that you can't control, period. Unless you're willing to move, you're stuck. On Bowen Island (basically just a rock sticking out of the ocean), I got 1/4 to 1/2 mile with my Rangemaster. In Pitt Meadows, on a flood plain with great ground conductivity, I managed well over a mile (and in just the right location, up to 2 miles). Same transmitter, same receiver, similar installations, but very different results.
And in fact, I managed to get close to a mile with a Talking Sign (similar to the Talking House) in Pitt Meadows, running the wire antenna outside. The Rangemaster had a better signal, with more range, but not that much better. Certainly not the difference that I saw between Bowen & Pitt Meadows with the same transmitter. I suspect that in that particular location (Pitt Meadows), I'd get close to a mile range with any decent Part 15 legal outdoor installation, due to those factors that you just don't control.
That's why I generally recommend that before anyone spend huge amounts of money, they experiment. Get an inexpensive transmitter such as the Talking House, put it outdoors and see first hand, practically, what kind of range you're going to get. You'll likely be able to better it somewhat with more expensive transmitters, radials, etc., but only to a degree. If all you can get is 1/4 mile, then don't expect to buy a Rangemaster and magically get over a mile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2018 19:39:58 GMT
Following On Artisan's Comments
To the points well made by Artisan Radio in the preceding paragraphs I completely agree, and will offer a few additional thoughts:
I get uncomfortable when I'm told that raising an AM antenna up to the roof or high on the pole will improve range. That statement makes false assumptions and leaves out important physics, perhaps due to ignorance.
If the same statement were made about an FM antenna it would be absolutely true... the higher the antenna above the earth the wider the range... up to the point of diminishing returns, which would be higher than anyone will probably build.
AM radio operates on the medium wave band with very long wavelengths and the most efficient signal can be achieved by placing the vertical antenna on the earth with ground radials buried slightly below the surface, the ensemble being away from nearby physical objects. This has probably been said more than anything else on these forums, but is forever ignored by those who want height to be an improvement for AM/MW, which it is not.
Another misconception is the notion that a ground rod will expand the range of a transmitter, which is only true to a small percentage-point... A ground rod will improve a transmitter's ability to be tuned to a proper peak-output according to the meter or the light-bulb, but the actual field distance will only slightly expand.
The one and only way to excite a vertical antenna to its maximum possible range is ground radials buried in the earth.
One will find varying lengths of radials make a useful difference, up to a point, but there is also the ground conductivity playing a role in the actual results, which Artisan mentioned.
Most frustrating to me of the many misunderstandings that never die are the folks who want a transmitter to work straight out of the box to serve an entire town, and give up instantly when disappointed with the first results.
This low power hobby requires most of all study and experimentation into the physics of radio electronics. Persons lacking the patience or interest to gather engineering knowledge should play with dolls or some less demanding hobby.
|
|